Bitter row over future of historical venue

Bitter row over future of historical venue.

A fierce dispute has erupted between two cultural institutions and a council over the future of a historical site.

Both Norwich Arts Centre and Norwich Theatre have sought to take over The Halls, a Grade I listed structure that is currently undergoing extensive renovations.

However, the arts centre claimed that the theatre’s legal battles against the site’s owner, Norwich City Council, harmed its successful bids.

The Norwich Theatre stated that the issues were caused by the council’s handling of the procedure. A fierce dispute has erupted between two cultural institutions and a council over the future of a historical site.

Both Norwich Arts Centre and Norwich Theatre have sought to take over The Halls, a Grade I listed structure that is currently undergoing extensive renovations.

However, the arts centre claimed that the theatre’s legal battles against the site’s owner, Norwich City Council, harmed its successful bids.

The Norwich Theatre stated that the issues were caused by the council’s handling of the procedure. The Halls, which include St Andrews and Blackfriars Halls, will close in early 2024 to allow for £6.9 million in renovations.

The facility was scheduled to reopen earlier this year, but it has subsequently been delayed, with expenses climbing to £7.8 million. Following its closure, the council advertised for a company to take over day-to-day operations of the facility, proposing a five-year contract.

Norwich Theatre, which operates the Theatre Royal and Playhouse, made a bid, but the arts centre won.

The process was repeated earlier this year, and the arts centre was once again selected in the procurement process.

‘Extremely disappointed’

The director, Pasco-Q Kevlin, has accused the theatre of undermining its winning bids.

He alleged that on both occasions, the theatre threatened the council with legal action, forcing the council to cancel the proceedings entirely.

“Further challenges followed by an extended court process would have been financially demanding for the council with additional lawyers’ fees and executive time potentially costing hundreds of thousands of pounds,” he told me.

“The council had to consider if it would be prudent to spend public money defending and justifying their decisions.”

Mr Kevlin was “extremely disappointed” because the arts centre’s goal was to transform The Halls into a “cultural hub” that would have acted as the East of England’s “Southbank Centre”. He also claimed that Norwich City Council’s Labour leader, Mike Stonard, served on the theatre’s board.

In response, Stonard declared that he had “not been involved in any way, shape, or form in any decision making about the procurement process”.

Paul Moseley/BBC Mike Stonard is sitting on a bench in Anglia Square. He's wearing a blue and white pinstripe shirt along with a light blue lanyard. He also is wearing glasses.Paul Moseley/BBC
Norwich Theatre stated that it faced issues as a result of how the procurement process was handled.
“No one benefits from a bad process or the withdrawal of the tender,” a theatre spokesman stated. She added that the theatre’s team were “big supporters of Norwich Arts Centre” and were “very sorry” to read what its director had stated.

Meanwhile, the councils said it was “sorry” it had withdrawn the offer of a contract, but it had “established the process did not meet the right standards”.

A spokeswoman said they were looking into “suitable arrangements” to manage the property, which they hoped to reopen “as soon as possible”.

She said that any decision will take into account plans for local government reorganisation, which will see all of Norfolk’s councils dissolved and replaced with new authorities by 2028.

Read more on Straightwinfortoday.com

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.