Thousands back bid to save two ‘majestic’ oak trees.
More than 2,000 people have signed a petition to save two oak trees in West Sussex that are about to be felled after causing damage to a neighbouring property.
Campaigners believe that Axa Insurance’s subsidence claim unfairly includes the trees on Willow Drive in Billingshurst.
Gabi Barrett, the petition’s initiator, is urging local officials and the insurer to reconsider their decision because “majestic trees” are “vital to the community’s ecosystem”. A spokeswoman for Axa responded:
“We are insurers to a policyholder whose home has been subject to serious subsidence over a number of years caused by nearby tree roots, including two oak trees on Willow Drive.”

Ms Barrett noted that the trees were a “living monument to the region’s heritage, continuity, and stability”. “The decision to fell these trees has been made on grounds that have not been sufficiently justified in the public interest,” according to her.
“Nothing should come at the cost of irreplaceable natural heritage.” David Barker, who has lived in the neighbourhood for 25 years, told the BBC that he was “shocked” by the decision to destroy the trees. “It’s a great shame,” he remarked.
“They are the heritage of this area we need to preserve.” Councillor John Trollope, who represents Billingshurst on Horsham District Council (HDC), encouraged Axa to “take a different approach”.
“Firstly we should settle the claim the householders have and to save the trees which are vital to our local nature,” he told me.
An HDC representative stated, “The council can confirm that consent was sought by an insurance company for the felling of two trees in Willow Drive.
“While the trees are mature in age they are not classified as veteran trees, as they do not meet the strict criteria.” According to the municipality, the insurance company submitted “robust evidence” that the trees “contributed to subsidence of a nearby property”.
It stated that if the application is denied, the local authorities will be accountable for any compensation expenses, which will be paid from already restricted public finances.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.